Tags

, , , , ,

Take a moment and imagine a scenario between a Naval Special Warfare Operator, such as a Navy SEAL, and a local municipal law enforcement officer.

Imagine the Navy SEAL is in civilian attire in a civilian situation in CONUS (Continental United States) and is pulled over, or confronted by an on-duty Officer for the county in any other type of casual everyday type of scenario.

How does it go down? Who establishes dominance, and respect? Does the small town Police Officer rate to confront, dictate and thus control the elite U.S. Special Forces Operator?

The simple and technical answer I can conclude is that yes, the Navy SEAL should take the speeding ticket, or cooperate with detainment like anyone else should. The law enforcement officer still is deputized, and has the legal authority to police – even if the Navy SEALs training and alpha-male resume’ far exceeds that of the law enforcement officer.

More simply put, the wolf is allowing himself to be controlled by a bunny rabbit – out of principle, and nothing else. But to what degree will the Navy SEAL’s respect for principle prevail? At what point does principle not become relevant, and the personal objectives of the SEAL outweigh that of the social obligations for the SEAL to comply with the social rules and legalities implemented by the very country which the SEAL swore to protect.

This scenario is make believe, but it represents a serious psychological dilemma in dominance and respect of authority.

And it does not just apply to SEAL Operators and Law Enforcement Officers.

[Original edit January 28, 2013, 8:12 pm PST]